Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Discrete Morse theory for manifolds with boundary
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Bruno Benedetti PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 6631-6670 Request permission

Abstract:

We introduce a version of discrete Morse theory specific for manifolds with boundary. The idea is to consider Morse functions for which all boundary cells are critical. We obtain “Relative Morse Inequalities” relating the homology of the manifold to the number of interior critical cells. We also derive a Ball Theorem, in analogy to Forman’s Sphere Theorem. The main corollaries of our work are:

  1. For each $d \ge 3$ and for each $k \ge 0$, there is a PL $d$-sphere on which any discrete Morse function has more than $k$ critical $(d-1)$-cells. (This solves a problem by Chari.)
  2. For fixed $d$ and $k$, there are exponentially many combinatorial types of simplicial $d$-manifolds (counted with respect to the number of facets) that admit discrete Morse functions with at most $k$ critical interior $(d-1)$-cells. (This connects discrete Morse theory to enumerative combinatorics/ discrete quantum gravity.)
  3. The barycentric subdivision of any simplicial constructible $d$-ball is collapsible. (This “almost” solves a problem by Hachimori.)
  4. Every constructible ball collapses onto its boundary minus a facet. (This improves a result by the author and Ziegler.)
  5. Any $3$-ball with a knotted spanning edge cannot collapse onto its boundary minus a facet. (This strengthens a classical result by Bing and a recent result by the author and Ziegler.)
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Bruno Benedetti
  • Affiliation: Institute of Mathematics, Freic Universität, Arnimallee 2, 14195 Berlin, Germany
  • Address at time of publication: Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Lindstedtsvägen 25, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Email: benedetti@math.fu-berlin.de, brunoben@kth.se
  • Received by editor(s): August 10, 2010
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: April 28, 2011
  • Published electronically: April 30, 2012
  • © Copyright 2012 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 6631-6670
  • MSC (2010): Primary 57Q10, 57Q15, 05A16, 52B22, 57M25
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2012-05614-5
  • MathSciNet review: 2958950