Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

A Berry-Esseen theorem for hypergeometric probabilities under minimal conditions
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by S. N. Lahiri and A. Chatterjee PDF
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), 1535-1545 Request permission

Abstract:

In this paper, we consider simple random sampling without replacement from a dichotomous finite population and derive a necessary and sufficient condition on the finite population parameters for a valid large sample Normal approximation to Hypergeometric probabilities. We then obtain lower and upper bounds on the difference between the Normal and the Hypergeometric distributions solely under this necessary and sufficient condition.
References
  • G. Jogesh Babu and Kesar Singh, Edgeworth expansions for sampling without replacement from finite populations, J. Multivariate Anal. 17 (1985), no. 3, 261–278. MR 813236, DOI 10.1016/0047-259X(85)90084-3
  • M. Bloznelis, A Berry-Esseen bound for finite population Student’s statistic, Ann. Probab. 27 (1999), no. 4, 2089–2108. MR 1742903, DOI 10.1214/aop/1022677563
  • Mindaugas Bloznelis and Friedrich Götze, An Edgeworth expansion for finite-population $U$-statistics, Bernoulli 6 (2000), no. 4, 729–760. MR 1777694, DOI 10.2307/3318517
  • Colin R. Blyth and Robert G. Staudte, Hypothesis estimates and acceptability profiles for $2\times 2$ contingency tables, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92 (1997), no. 438, 694–699. MR 1467859, DOI 10.2307/2965717
  • Burstein, H. (1975). Finite population correction for binomial confidence limits. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70 67-69.
  • Paul Erdős and Alfréd Rényi, On the central limit theorem for samples from a finite population, Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 4 (1959), 49–61 (English, with Russian and Hungarian summaries). MR 107294
  • William Feller, An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol. II. , 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London-Sydney, 1971. MR 0270403
  • Jaroslav Hájek, Limiting distributions in simple random sampling from a finite population, Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 5 (1960), 361–374 (English, with Russian summary). MR 125612
  • Lahiri, S. N., Chatterjee, A. and Maiti, T. (2004). A Sub-Gaussian Berry-Esseen Theorem for the Hypergeometric probabilities. Preprint # 2004-21 (posted at http://seabiscuit.stat.iastate.edu/departmental/preprint/preprint.html#2004), Iowa State University, IA (also, posted as math.PR/0602276 at http://arxiv.org).
  • W. L. Nicholson, On the normal approximation to the hypergeometric distribution, Ann. Math. Statist. 27 (1956), 471–483. MR 87246, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177728270
  • William G. Madow, On the limiting distributions of estimates based on samples from finite universes, Ann. Math. Statistics 19 (1948), 535–545. MR 29136, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177730149
  • Patel, J. K. and Samaranayake, V. A. (1991). Prediction intervals for some discrete distributions. Journal of Quality Technology 23 270-278.
  • Seber, G. A. F. (1970). The effects of trap response on tag recapture estimates. Biometrics 26 13-22.
  • Sohn, S. Y. (1997). Accelerated life-tests for intermittent destructive inspection, with logistic failure-distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 46 122-1295.
  • John P. Wendell and Josef Schmee, Exact inference for proportions from a stratified finite population, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 (1996), no. 434, 825–830. MR 1395749, DOI 10.2307/2291677
  • Wittes, J. T. (1972). On the bias and estimated variance of Chapman’s two-sample capture-recapture population estimate. Biometrics 28 592-597.
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • S. N. Lahiri
  • Affiliation: Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
  • Address at time of publication: Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
  • MR Author ID: 310114
  • Email: snlahiri@iastate.edu
  • A. Chatterjee
  • Affiliation: Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
  • Address at time of publication: Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
  • Email: cha@iastate.edu
  • Received by editor(s): April 12, 2005
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: February 16, 2006
  • Published electronically: January 5, 2007
  • Additional Notes: This research was partially supported by NSF grant no. DMS 0306574.
  • Communicated by: Edward C. Waymire
  • © Copyright 2007 American Mathematical Society
    The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), 1535-1545
  • MSC (2000): Primary 60F05; Secondary 60G10, 62E20, 62D05
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08676-5
  • MathSciNet review: 2276664